There's more than meets the eye
Register now to unlock all subforums and the ability to search. As a guest, your view is limited to only a part of The Sound Board.

TV Tips

Where we discuss film, television, books, theater, games, and of course music, concerts, and artists. Anyone can view, any member can contribute.
User avatar

Geoff Grace
Posts: 814
Joined: Sep 29, 2018 3:21 pm

Re: TV Tips

Post by Geoff Grace »

Ashermusic wrote: Dec 13, 2025 12:57 pm Can quality shows have so much graphic violence for you to the point where you feel kind of sorry after you watch?

“Peaky Blinders” ran for six seasons and a film is coming out and it has been widely praised as one of the best shows in years. I hadn’t seen it until yesterday, when I watched the first two episodes, and this morning when I started to watch another.

It’s as good as advertised, especially Cillian Murphy, but jeez, I felt kind of sickened by it and I don’t think I want to watch more.

Any of you react that way to that kind of show, quality though it may be?
I’ve never liked gratuitous or graphic violence, Jay. I even struggle with violence that has an educational aspect, as it did in Band of Brothers.

I typically watch TV to escape from stress rather than embrace it. As a result, (American) football and the news are usually the most violent things I watch.

Best,

Geoff


Topic author
Guy Rowland
Posts: 16987
Joined: Aug 02, 2015 8:11 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: TV Tips

Post by Guy Rowland »

Ashermusic wrote: Dec 13, 2025 12:57 pm Can quality shows have so much graphic violence for you to the point where you feel kind of sorry after you watch?

“Peaky Blinders” ran for six seasons and a film is coming out and it has been widely praised as one of the best shows in years. I hadn’t seen it until yesterday, when I watched the first two episodes, and this morning when I started to watch another.

It’s as good as advertised, especially Cillian Murphy, but jeez, I felt kind of sickened by it and I don’t think I want to watch more.

Any of you react that way to that kind of show, quality though it may be?
Like Geoff I have a really low tolerance for graphic violence, I can't stand it. A few shows I've made it through, I guess Breaking Bad would be one example, but I so nearly bailed after the 2nd or 3rd episode - I think I'd heard that the violence was infrequent and so it turned out to be (in fact I I'm not sure Season Two had any at all). Sometimes it's vital that it is in there - American History X or All Quiet On The Western Front just two film examples, but I've noticed even though I think both are excellent and the violence was right, I can never bring myself to re-watch them.

I've never done Peaky Blinders, unsurprisingly.


Lawrence
Posts: 9146
Joined: Aug 23, 2015 3:28 am
Location: New York City

Re: TV Tips

Post by Lawrence »

In most of Tarantino’s films, the violence is not only gratuitous, it’s gleeful. However, it’s so over the top that it crosses over into the comedic. The fight scene in “Kill Bill” that featured the Crazy 88’s is a prime example- lots of hacked off limbs, all of them deliberately spurting gallons of blood that spray everywhere-it’s ridiculous but left me feeling sort of queasy.

Peaky Blinders, Deadwood-these were period series in violent times and incredibly well written. All of Scorsese’s Mafia oeuvre, The Godfather trilogy and Apocalypse Now by Coppola, fantastic films regardless of violence, great writing, amazing cinematography.

Some films that include psychological as well as physical violence are too hard for me.
Two I can think of-“Hostel “and “Funny Games.” Couldn’t make it through either.

Peaky Blinders is, in my opinion, can’t miss entertainment regardless of violence. Fantastic drawing of characters, great acting, great writing, amazing sets, interesting material about ethnicities.

User avatar

Ashermusic
Posts: 4328
Joined: Nov 16, 2015 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: TV Tips

Post by Ashermusic »

Like it’s two predecessors in the Knives Out series, Wake Up, Dead Man is big time fun!
Charlie Clouser: " I have no interest in, and no need to create, "realistic orchestral mockups". That way lies madness."

www.jayasher.com


Topic author
Guy Rowland
Posts: 16987
Joined: Aug 02, 2015 8:11 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: TV Tips

Post by Guy Rowland »

Spoilerful thoughts after seeing the finale of ep 1 of Pluribus:
► Show Spoiler


Topic author
Guy Rowland
Posts: 16987
Joined: Aug 02, 2015 8:11 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: TV Tips

Post by Guy Rowland »

PluribuS
► Show Spoiler


Topic author
Guy Rowland
Posts: 16987
Joined: Aug 02, 2015 8:11 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: TV Tips

Post by Guy Rowland »

Good to see Rhea Seehorn winning best actress in the Critics Choice awards for Pluribus - she never won anything for her incredible performance in Better Call Saul.

I also see Tramell Tillman won best supporting actor for Severance. All the cast are strong, but he is exceptional. Even though season two was a major disappointment for me, great to see he won.

The biggest TV winner - best drama, best actor, supporting actress - was The Pitt. I don't recall anyone mentioning it here. We have a good excuse not to in the UK - it STILL hasn't been released, but this is about to change I believe. Very much looking forward to trying it.

The Studio picked up the comedy awards - it was okay, quite clever and well executed in places but I honestly didn't love it. I think my tolerance for industry navel-gazing has diminished over the years.

Adolescence won best Limited Series and quite right too - that was exceptional. It picked up almost all the acting awards, including the extraordinary young actor Owen Cooper. But I was most thrilled to see Erin Doherty win, she was only in one episode (3) but she was phenomenal. I don't think I'll ever forget it.

No music awards at the Critics Choice! Boo.


wst3
Posts: 4051
Joined: Sep 16, 2015 4:56 pm
Location: The Western Philly 'burbs
Contact:

Re: TV Tips

Post by wst3 »

I can't remember the title, but Kevin Bacon starred as your stereotypical burnt out FBI Behaviorist who was (predictably) called back to help with an especially difficult case. The series was dark, and had more violence than I like, but it was, at the same time compelling. I got sucked in. Judi did not, and after a couple of episodes opted out of watching it. So I ended up watching it when she was busy or asleep.

And now I'm wishing I hadn't. I won't spoil anything, except to say that the finale was over-the-top dark and violent, and left me feeling like I had wasted my time watching it.

Quality is important. It is especially important for shows that lean towards the darker side of humanity. Maybe I've just watched one too many, but I am a lot less likely to watch all the way through.

The same can be said for a lot of shows though - I find myself getting bored, even when there are plenty of twists... they just don't interest me.

User avatar

Ashermusic
Posts: 4328
Joined: Nov 16, 2015 10:37 am
Contact:

Re: TV Tips

Post by Ashermusic »

Bill it was called “The Following” and James Purefoy was the villain.

I though it was brilliant. It’s being streamed for free on Tubi, along with my “Zorro” tv series,which is considerably less dark 😆
Charlie Clouser: " I have no interest in, and no need to create, "realistic orchestral mockups". That way lies madness."

www.jayasher.com


wst3
Posts: 4051
Joined: Sep 16, 2015 4:56 pm
Location: The Western Philly 'burbs
Contact:

Re: TV Tips

Post by wst3 »

Jay - that's the one. It was brilliant, well written, well cast, well acted, well directed, well produced, and I enjoyed it, right up until the end. The end disturbed me, and I am not easy to disturb.

Post Reply