For my purposes, Waves Clarity vX is brilliant. I do a fair amount of voice recording and acoustic guitar recording and my space is fairly noisy. External noise from windows, a slight refrigerator and wine cooler hum, etc. Clarity removes a LOT of that with minimal artifacts. I’m sure there are other and newer plug-ins that do the same thing but clarity does the job for me, was very reasonably priced and is easy as pie to use. BUT:
The other day I produced a hip-hop session that had a lot of rap voices and a multitracked female vocal line. I used multiple instances of Clarity to remove the room noise, which can really build up. It was working great until I got up to about five or six instances at which time my computer went nuts. The processor bar was flying into the red constantly. I used a lot of other plug-ins during the session so I didn’t know exactly what was going on At one point Cubase simply refused to play back. Pretty embarrassing in front of a client.
In the long run, trial and error led me to the Clarity plug-in, or rather the amount of instances used. My computer is pretty old, (2019 Intel iMac) but I have never run into a chokepoint like that since I bought it. Subsequent Googling confirmed it, it really is a thing. The solution was simple, group the vocals and track in sensible ways and use less instances.
I doubt a lot of you have the same challenges that I do when recording live in my living room with an older computer (or are even Clarity users) so just an FYI.
There's more than meets the eye
Register now to unlock all subforums and the ability to search. As a guest, your view is limited to only a part of The Sound Board.
Interesting experience with Clarity vX
-
Topic author - Posts: 8973
- Joined: Aug 23, 2015 3:28 am
- Location: New York City
-
- Posts: 16736
- Joined: Aug 02, 2015 8:11 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: Interesting experience with Clarity vX
It is thirsty. Weirdly, in Pro Tools on my older rig it would fall over when previewing it in Audio Suite mode. That's offline processing! Real time was a lot better, but it was still quite demanding.
Maybe you'd ran out of cores, and it then inadvertently attempted to run 2 instances on a single core.
In general when I wanted to use it in real time on a bunch o tracks, I'd route it all via a group (aux in PT terminology) and insert just 1 instance on that group. If you need to separate for a final mix you could offline process the clips maybe?
Maybe you'd ran out of cores, and it then inadvertently attempted to run 2 instances on a single core.
In general when I wanted to use it in real time on a bunch o tracks, I'd route it all via a group (aux in PT terminology) and insert just 1 instance on that group. If you need to separate for a final mix you could offline process the clips maybe?
-
Topic author - Posts: 8973
- Joined: Aug 23, 2015 3:28 am
- Location: New York City
Re: Interesting experience with Clarity vX
….which is what I ultimately did, Guy. Maybe my post lacked, ummm….clarity?
(I mean the group thingie, not the offline processing. I’d always rather stay live if possible.)
(I mean the group thingie, not the offline processing. I’d always rather stay live if possible.)