There's more than meets the eye
Register now to unlock all subforums. As a guest, your view is limited to only a part of The Sound Board.

The death of the band

Where we discuss film, television, books, theater, games, and of course music, concerts, and artists. Anyone can view, any member can contribute.
Post Reply

Topic author
Guy Rowland
Posts: 16304
Joined: Aug 02, 2015 8:11 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

The death of the band

Post by Guy Rowland »

In the first 5 years of the 80s in the UK singles charts, there were 146 bands.

In the first 5 years of the 90s in the UK singles charts, there were 141 bands.

In the first 5 years of the 20s in the UK single charts so far, there have been 3 bands. One was The Radio 1 Live Lounge All Stars (actually a supergroup of solo artists). Another was The Beatles. That leaves just one true contemporary band - Little Mix.

This does make me sad. Rick Beato does a good run down of some of the reasons here (and adds plenty more supportive stats). But I can't help wondering if there's another societal factor at work. Many successful solo artists today - and I admire the hell out of a lot of them - are very strong characters, with a strong personal story and take on the world. With a band, you have multiple people, which dilutes things. You might occasionally get them so packaged you can't tell them apart - Westlife - but most of the time they were a disparate bunch, even in manufactured pop groups. The Spice Girls were marketed as 5 colourful distinct individuals, each with a single-word defining trait.

If feels a little like the Instagram / TikTok generation is all about a personal profile - a packaged and curated variant of seemingly every individual on Earth. Bands are ensembles, groups of people. Friends. There's no real social media profile of a group of individuals.

With the demise of (commercially successful) bands, I feel we're missing something.


Post Reply