There's more than meets the eye
Register now to unlock all subforums. As a guest, your view is limited to only a part of The Sound Board.

Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Instruments, effects, DAWs -- any hardware or software we use to make music. Anyone can view, any member can contribute.
Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
Marius
Posts: 835
Joined: Sep 16, 2015 4:01 pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by Marius »

Last two libraries from Spitfire for 2015!

Chrysalis, the studio harp and processed goodies library:


And volume 1 (violin) of a new string quartet library:
Marius Masalar | http://mariusmasalar.me

User avatar

FriFlo
Posts: 860
Joined: Nov 15, 2015 8:50 am

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by FriFlo »

Hmm ... it sounds very nice, but it seems like it is entirely on the soft side ... like a library designed to play up to mf ...

User avatar

kpc
Posts: 2026
Joined: Nov 15, 2015 6:20 pm
Location: West Michigan
Contact:

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by kpc »

FriFlo wrote:Hmm ... it sounds very nice, but it seems like it is entirely on the soft side ... like a library designed to play up to mf ...
Yeah, that's one of the things I like about it. I'm a bit tired of the bombastically huge, epic stuff coming out. I'm on the fence about these two, mostly due to budget issues, but I like the quiet sweet sound. Of course I on,y had a cursory listen.

Kc
- kayle

Online

Guy Rowland
Posts: 16305
Joined: Aug 02, 2015 8:11 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by Guy Rowland »

Both sound lovely. Totally wedded to the Virharmonic approach (in theory... should be trying it myself soon) so the violin isn't so much of a pull. The Samuel Sim library is rather tempting though, must admit,


Killiard
Posts: 536
Joined: Nov 16, 2015 11:34 am
Location: Exeter, U.K.
Contact:

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by Killiard »

Love the sound of the strings. I naturally gravitate towards softer sounding strings anyway :-)


Lawrence
Posts: 8707
Joined: Aug 23, 2015 3:28 am
Location: New York City

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by Lawrence »

I love the sound and the agility of the violin. I was thinking "they've nailed it!" until I realized (correct me if you got a different impression) that there are no non-vibrato or non-vibrato to vibrato longs.

The harp sounds beautiful but doesn't seem to have the option of a really crisp and present sound. Maybe that could be done with EQ.


Killiard
Posts: 536
Joined: Nov 16, 2015 11:34 am
Location: Exeter, U.K.
Contact:

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by Killiard »

He seems to be using the vibrato slider when playing the longs patch in the walkthrough. Unless I've misunderstood what you're meaning.


Lawrence
Posts: 8707
Joined: Aug 23, 2015 3:28 am
Location: New York City

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by Lawrence »

Yes, from less to more, unless I have it wrong, which would make me pretty happy!

Edit- I'm probably not being clear. I always want the option to have no vibrato at all.

User avatar

FriFlo
Posts: 860
Joined: Nov 15, 2015 8:50 am

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by FriFlo »

kpc wrote:
FriFlo wrote:Hmm ... it sounds very nice, but it seems like it is entirely on the soft side ... like a library designed to play up to mf ...
Yeah, that's one of the things I like about it. I'm a bit tired of the bombastically huge, epic stuff coming out. I'm on the fence about these two, mostly due to budget issues, but I like the quiet sweet sound. Of course I on,y had a cursory listen.

Kc
Yeah, but that is not my point. I meant it sounds to weak an kind of without any emotion. And ff does not have to be epic ... :-)
It would be interesting done with more detail IMO. More layers, more dynamic, a few articulations more ...


Killiard
Posts: 536
Joined: Nov 16, 2015 11:34 am
Location: Exeter, U.K.
Contact:

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by Killiard »

Lawrence wrote:Yes, from less to more, unless I have it wrong, which would make me pretty happy!

Edit- I'm probably not being clear. I always want the option to have no vibrato at all.
It's alright, I figured that out after the cogs in my head started moving. I'd be surprised if it didn't go to no vibrato. I like the option too!


Raymond_Kemp
Posts: 1060
Joined: Nov 15, 2015 10:17 am
Location: Stirling, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by Raymond_Kemp »

Killiard wrote:
Lawrence wrote:Yes, from less to more, unless I have it wrong, which would make me pretty happy!

Edit- I'm probably not being clear. I always want the option to have no vibrato at all.
It's alright, I figured that out after the cogs in my head started moving. I'd be surprised if it didn't go to no vibrato. I like the option too!
Of course the longs have control of vibrato intensity which includes 'off'


Lawrence
Posts: 8707
Joined: Aug 23, 2015 3:28 am
Location: New York City

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by Lawrence »

Ray, you know this how?

User avatar

ZeeCount
Posts: 140
Joined: Nov 15, 2015 3:12 pm
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by ZeeCount »

I bought it, and I can confirm that on the longs patch the vibrato control goes all the way to "no vibrato".
Soundcloud __________ Youtube


Lawrence
Posts: 8707
Joined: Aug 23, 2015 3:28 am
Location: New York City

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by Lawrence »

That's awesome, thanks! What do you think of it?

Edit-is the "longs patch" also the legato patch?

User avatar

dadek
Posts: 8
Joined: Nov 16, 2015 3:13 pm

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by dadek »

Has anyone heard anything about the ETA of the rest of the string quartet? If we only get Vl 1, and they only get in the hall one day a year, it seems we could be waiting a while...
Sounds lovely and I'd love the whole quartet for writing, less for solo mock ups, especially with the stage position it's been recorded in.
...meanwhile downloading Chrysalis.

User avatar

ZeeCount
Posts: 140
Joined: Nov 15, 2015 3:12 pm
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by ZeeCount »

Lawrence wrote:That's awesome, thanks! What do you think of it?

Edit-is the "longs patch" also the legato patch?
Only had a brief runover with it, but so far I like what I hear. It has a very smooth delicate sound with a really pleasant room ambiance that doesn't get too overbearing. The close ribbon mic is pretty dry, while you can hear a bit of a release trail on the standard close mic. The ambient mic makes them sound like they are at the back of a hall, but they still retain a good amount of definition.

They remind me a bit of the BML horns that I have, in regards to the fact that they feel like they only reach a tentative F in dynamics. One of the reasons I bought them was to augment LASS and give them a bit more detail and it looks like it will serve this purpose quite well.

The legatos are on a separate patch called "playable" from the rest.

Two negatives: It looks like the volume of the marcato patch has been assigned to the vibrato by mistake because reducing vibrato also reduce the volume of the patch and it would be nice if there were muted samples.
Soundcloud __________ Youtube

User avatar

ZeeCount
Posts: 140
Joined: Nov 15, 2015 3:12 pm
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Spitfire Chrysalis & Sacconi Quartet Vol. 1

Post by ZeeCount »

Also from the other board:
"Kindly received a quick message after putting a request via sf support from Paul that in a soon to be released update they will add the already recorded portamento."
Soundcloud __________ Youtube

Post Reply